For the following Relational Operator blocks, the first input has the \ngreater positive range. The second input is conv

Post Reply
sharifhosseini
Posts: 1459
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2021 7:27 am
Contact:

For the following Relational Operator blocks, the first input has the \ngreater positive range. The second input is conv

Post by sharifhosseini »

For the following Relational Operator blocks, the first input has the \ngreater positive range. The second input is converted to the \ndata type and scaling of the first input prior to performing \nthe relational operation. \nA range error can occur when casting. \nYou can insert Data Type Conversion blocks \nin front of the Relational Operator block to \nconvert both inputs to a common data type that has sufficient \nrange and precision to perfectly represent each input. The relational \noperation would then be error-free

For the following Relational Operator blocks, the first input has the \ngreater positive range. The second input is converted to the \ndata type and scaling of the first input prior to performing \nthe relational operation. \nThere can be a precision loss each time the conversion is performed. \nYou can insert Data Type Conversion blocks \nin front of the Relational Operator block to \nconvert both inputs to a common data type that has sufficient \nrange and precision to perfectly represent each input. The relational \noperation would then be error-free

For the following Relational Operator blocks, the second input has the \ngreater positive range. The first input is converted to the \ndata type and scaling of the second input prior to performing \nthe relational operation. \nA range error can occur when casting. \nYou can insert Data Type Conversion blocks \nin front of the Relational Operator block to \nconvert both inputs to a common data type that has sufficient \nrange and precision to perfectly represent each input. The relational \noperation would then be error-free

For the following Relational Operator blocks, the second input has the \ngreater positive range. The first input is converted to the \ndata type and scaling of the second input prior to performing \nthe relational operation. \nThere can be a precision loss each time the conversion is performed. \nYou can insert Data Type Conversion blocks \nin front of the Relational Operator block to \nconvert both inputs to a common data type that has sufficient \nrange and precision to perfectly represent each input. The relational \noperation would then be error-free. </entry>



engine
Post Reply

Return to “Simulink Check”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest